The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) demanding further transparency in the allocation of cases to be heard by each bench of the apex court. Dismissing the PIL, the bench stated that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) has the constitutional authority to allocate the cases.
Chief Justice of India is the “first among equals” and has the constitutional authority to decide allocation of cases and setting up of benches to hear them, the Supreme Court ruled in its reasoning while dismissing the plea.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud dismissed a PIL seeking framing of guidelines for rational and transparent allocation of cases and constitution of benches to hear them.
Justice Chandrachud, writing the judgment for the bench, referred to constitutional schemes and said “the Chief Justice of India is first among equals and has the authority to decide allocation of cases and setting up of benches”.
Since the CJI is a high constitutional functionary, there cannot be “any distrust about the responsibilities he discharges” to ensure that the Supreme Court to carries out the work required under the Constitution, the order stated.
The PIL was filed in the backdrop of the January 12 press conference held by senior-most apex court judges including Justices J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph, an unprecedented event.
The judges had alleged improper allocation of cases by the CJI, saying “Things are not in order in the Supreme Court”.
The PIL was filed by an Ashok Pande seeking guidelines for the Supreme Court and all the high courts on the allocation of cases and the setting up of benches.
Another plea raising similar demands has been filed in the Supreme Court last week by former Law Minister and advocate Shanti Bhushan.
(With inputs from PTI)