Supreme Court modifies its own order on govt ads

RSTV Bureau
File Photo: Supreme Court Directed RBI to provide names of defaulters in a sealed envelop to it.

File Photo: Supreme Court Directed RBI to provide names of defaulters in a sealed envelop to it.

On Friday Supreme Court modified its earlier order on government ads. The apex court has now changed the parameters to allow pictures of union ministers, chief ministers, governors and state ministers to appear in government advertisements.

The verdict came on pleas by Centre and states including poll-bound West Bengal and Tamil Nadu which had sought review of the Supreme Court judgement barring publication of leaders’ photos in advertisements except those of the President, Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India. The plea said that the rule infringed fundamental rights and federal structure.

“We review our judgement by which we have allowed the publication of pictures of the President of India and Prime Minister in the government advertisements. Now we allow the publication of pictures of Union Ministers of concerned departments, Chief Ministers, Governors and State Ministers of the concerned departments…Rest of the conditions and exceptions will remain as it is,” a bench comprising of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and PC Ghose said.

The apex court had on March 9 reserved its verdict on the review pleas.

Earlier, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Centre, had strongly favoured review of the verdict on various grounds including that if Prime Minister’s photograph is allowed in the advertisements then the same right should be available to his cabinet colleagues as the PM is the “first among the equals”.

The AG had also said that the Chief Ministers and their cabinet colleagues too should be allowed to feature in advertisements.

Besides Centre, states of Karnataka, West Bengal, Assam, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Chattisgarh had also sought review of the May 13, 2015 verdict of the apex court.

The Centre, while seeking review, had earlier said that Article 19 (freedom of speech and expression) of the Indian Constitution empowers the state and the citizens to “give and receive” information and it cannot be curtailed and regulated by the courts.

The Attorney General had said if only Prime Minister’s photograph is allowed in government advertisements then it can be said that it would promote “personality cult” which has been described as “an anti-thesis of democracy” by this court only.

Other ministers and the Chief Ministers are also answerable to public and they cannot remain “faceless”, he had said, adding that the apex court verdict has dealt with print advertisements only in the time where electronic and social media are also there.

The Centre had on October 27 last year joined hands with several state governments in seeking review of the Supreme Court’s landmark judgement on the issue.

(With inputs from PTI)